Bad Fruit

3 Corrupted Translators Produce;
3 Corrupted Alexandrian Translations;

Which form the Basis for nearly every New Modern English Bible Translation:
The Testimony of these 3 men is compromised,
The Work and Fruit of these 3 men is compromised.
But all this is hidden and buried to protect the lies,
and cover up the reality of what they have done.

Instead of exposing the corrupted texts, and the history behind them, and the corrupted men, and the history behind them–The Biblical Translation Industry has put a cabash on all things truthful about these 3 translators and these these corrupted texts, and instead have run an exceedingly effective smear campaign on the KJV Bible, and have selected highly questionable texts in which to prove the superiority of the corrupted texts, and their work has filled the seminaries, filled the pulpits, and filled the congregations with an inferior and corrupted Bible.)

Below is a Marketing Campaign sold to the masses: regarding the reliability of the Modern Bible Translations.

Shortly we will expose the lie below:

The three main Alexandrian manuscripts most influential for translating Modern Bible versions are:

Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ or Aleph)
- Discovered in the 19th century at St. Catherine’s Monastery in Sinai.
- Dates to the mid-4th century (around 330–360AD).
- Contains the entire New Testament and much of the Old Testament.
Codex Vaticanus (B)
- Held in the Vatican Library since at least the 15th century.
- Dates to the early-to-mid 4th century (around 325–350AD).
- Contains nearly the whole Bible, missing a few parts.
Codex Alexandrinus (A)
- Dates to the early 5th century (around 400AD).
- Contains nearly the entire Bible (most of the Old and New Testaments).

All these three documents are sourced from the compromised Leadership and Scholarship of the Hellenistic (Greek Philosophy) that mixed itself with Christianity, and created compromised or rather corrupted Greek Bibilical Texts that tended to support their anti-Biblical Philosophy, Leadership, and Training.

These 3 documents are in direct opposition to the Syrian Antioch documents produced by the faithful leadership and uncompromised scholarship of the Sending Church of the First and Second Centuries.

These manuscripts, originating from or associated with Alexandria, Egypt, are continually promoted as the earliest and most complete Greek sources for the New Testament: BUT ARE THEY REALLY? WHO SAYS SO AND WHY?

These 3 manuscripts are advertised, and marketed, as “highly valued in modern textual criticism.”

Most contemporary Bible translations (such as the ESV, NIV, NASB, etc.) rely heavily on the textual readings found in these Alexandrian manuscripts rather than the later Byzantine tradition used for the KJV.

This is clearly evidenced by the many critical missing verses, phrases, add whole passages that have been removed from the Alexandrian manuscripts that are solidly maintained in the Antioch manuscripts that maintain the apostolic teachings that are the foundation for the King James Bible.

What has been exposed? There is a War between the Southern Alexandrian Texts (3), and the Syrian Antioch Text (based on 5,000 plus manuscripts). This War is very similar to War between the Protestant Church, and the Popish Roman Catholic Church, and the Teachings and Bibles they both use to promote their doctrines and faith.
Can it be a simple coincidence that the modern translators and their modern translation is astonishingly friendly and accomodating to the Catholic Doctrines making the way for promoting anit-Biblical Teachings clearly outlined in the Antioch Texts?
Can it be a coincidence that there has been a dramatic low in christian faith and practice every since the flood of modern Bible Translations have flooded the market?
Can it be a coincidence that their has been a metioric rise in sin ever since the acceptance of these modern translations being received into modern evangelical churches.

The dirty little secret

What is not revealed above is the dirty little secret that forms the underbelly of these highly compromised translations.

When it comes to public perception marketing is everything. What this post will attempt to do (with integrity)
is expose the dirty little secret and blast a whole in the fake marketing campaign slogan used repeatedly “the oldest and most relatable manuscripts.”

Let’s start by taking a careful look at the scriptures that call the believer into a place of discernment.

Here, God is Calling every believer: to the work of judging a tree by its fruit. If we cannot do that, we will fall under the influence of the Devil, and fall prey to any false statement, false scripture, or false interpretation, he can concoct to lead us away from our purity in Christ.

You can tell a tree by its fruit.

Every tree is known by the Fruit it reproduces.

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

Every Tree (believer) is known by the Fruit he reproduces.
Every pastor and church Leader is known by the Fruit he reproduces.
Every Church Fellowship is known by the Fruit it produces.
Every Church Denomination, and Local, County, State, National, and International Ministry is knwon by the Fruit it Reproduces.

Every Bible Translation is known by the Fruit it reproduces.

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

Scripture Draws a Line in the Sand, and compels us to take a stand.

God’s Word: Compels us to choose what we shall become.

Who we shall serve?
Whom we shall imitate and emulate?
What will determine our eternal future inheritance:
What will shape our example of Being a Good Tree or a Bad Tree?

God’s Word also compels us to use the wisdom from God’s Word to Judge the fruit in our own lives as well as the fruit in others lives, especially those who claim leadership roles in our lives. Not to do so, is to ignore the very warning of Scripture.

What do we know about the New Modern Bible Translations, and the Promoters and Instigators of their Existence?

They did not abide in Christ.
They had not repented of their sins, and their spirit of unbelief.
Their motives for creating a new Translation were selfish and self promoting.
They worshipped Mammon, above the word of God.
They were not true disciples of the living word of God.
They didn’t care about the compromises made in the midst of their selfish decisions.
They were Darwinists.
They didn’t even believe in the Word of God they were Translating.
They were in it for the money. They sacrificed the word of God for their own self interest.
They were in it for their own benefit. They were in it for the popularity fame and status.
They were not righteously concerned about properly serving the body of Christ.
They would not have died to defend the Bible or the faith of Bible, or for their savior.
They promoted themselves.
They lied about their motives.
The marketing and massive advertising scams never alerted the people to the questionable practices, sources, translations, translators,
They stole authority

Before looking at the Fruit of the infamous 3 Bible Translators, let’s review the Biblical teaching regarding the Tree that produces the bad fruit.

Scriptures related to Bearing Good Fruit

Matthew 3:1-3 (KJV) 1 In those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judaea, 2 And saying, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. 3 For this is he that was spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight.

Matthew 3:10 (KJV) And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

Matthew 7:15-23 (KJV) 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Matthew 12:33-37 (KJV) 33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by his fruit. 34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. 35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. 36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.

Luke 6:43-45 (KJV) 43 For a good tree bringeth not forth corrupt fruit; neither doth a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 44 For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. 45 A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.

Luke 6:47-49 (KJV) 47 Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like: 48 He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock. 49 But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great.

Matthew 7:24-29 (NIV) 24 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. 25 The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. 26 But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. 27 The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.”

28 When Jesus had finished saying these things, the crowds were amazed at his teaching, 29 because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.

Matthew 12:48-50 (KJV) 48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

What kind of character stands behind our modern Bible translators?

Every Bible Translator is known by the Fruit he reproduces.

Here is a compiled list of quotations highlighting concerns about personal character, flaws, and anti-biblical or controversial behaviors and beliefs—regarding the leadership of the 3 primary Translators of the Modern English Bible Versions, that come from the alleged “older and more reliable manuscripts” produced by these three men:

Constantin von Tischendorf,
Brooke Foss Westcott, and
Fenton John Anthony Hort.

These are the men who decided to give us our alleged new and improved Bible Translation:

By Claiming their NEW TRANSLATION is “older and more reliable” they began a perpetual smear campaign against the one true, uncorrupted, and not purposefully manipulated honoring text of the original Trustworthy English Bible.

These men were pivotal in the shift of New Testament textual foundations from the Antiochian-Byzantine manuscripts to the Alexandrian-based text types.

Constantin von Tischendorf

Controversies over Integrity: Some historians and scholars have questioned Tischendorf’s candor and integrity in the negotiation and acquisition of Codex Sinaiticus, suggesting that his dealings with the monks of St. Catherine’s Monastery may not have been entirely open or ethical, and that he allegedly promised to return the manuscript but failed to do so when requested.
In other words. Tischendorf, stole the manuscripts, that he used as the foundation for a totally new Bible Translation.
Therefore: Tischendorf was a thief.
That in itself is enough to condemn not only the translator, but the whole translation. If the root is bad, so in the trunk, the branch and the fruit. The root of the entire bible translation was based on a theft.
It should be obvious that Tischendorf was mostly focused on his own advancement in the world of Bible Translations. He saw an opportunity to create a whole new bible, and he pounced on it. His tactics were clearly unethical but of course he justified his actions to support his own agenda.
historyofinformation

Brooke Foss Westcott

Doubts about Scripture’s Infallibility:
- “I reject the infallibility of Holy Scriptures overwhelmingly.”
  (The Life and Letters of Brook Foss Westcott, Vol. I, p.207)
Unorthodox Doctrines and Practices:
- Westcott is reported to believe in communicating with the dead (prayers for the dead), purgatory, and admiration for Mary. stewartonbibleschool.
- Westcott was the founding member of the Ghostly Guild, for more than 10 years. His partner in this ministry was none other than Fenton John Anthony Hort.
- Westcott thought heaven was “a state of the mind” and Christ’s second coming was spiritual rather than literal.
- He denied biblical inerrancy and expressed skepticism about the miracles of Jesus and the creation account in Genesis, asserting that the first chapters of Genesis are not literal history.christianforums+1
- Westcott was essentiallly a liberal elitist intellectual, who clearly had a low opionion of the Bible, the Bible mandate for Evangelsim, Discipleship, Repentance, Obedience to the Scriptures, and the power and authority of God’s Word.

Ecumenical and Roman Catholic Leanings:
- He is criticized for advocating views more in common with Roman Catholic doctrine than with Evangelical Protestant beliefs.
Summary of Criticism:
- Westcott was described as a “sceptic” who doubted or denied many basic elements of biblical faith—including infallibility of the New Testament, creation, and miracles—suggesting that he lacked simple faith and never claimed personal salvation. stewartonbibleschool
- In other words: Westcott was never born again, and likely would have despised such a notion.

Fenton John Anthony Hort

Rejection of Traditional Doctrines:
- “The popular doctrine of substitution is an immoral and material counterfeit… nothing can be more unscriptural than the limiting of Christ’s bearing our sins and sufferings to His death…”
  (Hort to Westcott, Life and Letters, Vol. I, p. 430)
  - In other words, HORT rejected Jesus work on the cross, and the whole ministry of Christ to come into the world and take on the sins of the world, and to offer for forgiveness of sins to the work of the cross. In other words, HORT rejected the whole purpose of Jesus coming and becoming a man to do the world of his father.
Views on Creation and Evolution:
- Hort wrote: “But the book that has most engaged me is Darwin. Whatever may be thought of it, it is a book that one is proud to be contemporary with… My feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable.”
  (cited from Which Bible?, p. 189)
Embrace of Roman Catholic Beliefs and Practices:
- Hort stated: “I have been persuaded for many years that Mary-Worship and Jesus-Worship have very much in common.”
  (Hort, Life and Letters, Volume II, pp. 49-51)
- “The pure Romanish view seems to be nearer, and more likely to lead to the truth than the Evangelical.”
  (Life and Letters, Vol. I, p. 77)
On Hell and Afterlife:
- “We have no sure knowledge of future punishment, and the word eternal has a far higher meaning.”
  (Life and Letters, Vol. I, p.149)
Overall Critique:
- Hort’s skepticism about creation, infallibility of Scripture, and traditional Protestant doctrines, as well as his openness to evolutionary theory, purgatory, prayers for the dead, and Marian devotion, have been thoroughly criticized as anti-biblical by some Protestant sources.christianforums+1

Notable Patterns Common to Both Westcott & Hort

Both are repeatedly accused in conservative Protestant circles of:
- Rejecting or doubting biblical infallibility and literal creation.
- Being overly influenced by higher criticism, Roman Catholic dogmas, and evolutionary theory.
- Undermining “simple faith” and the authority of Scripture in favor of scholarly speculation or personal inclination.
- Introducing significant textual changes based on the Alexandrian manuscripts, seen as a break from traditional (Byzantine) textual tradition.stewartonbibleschool

Citations

All quotations and character evaluations are based on selections from their own published letters and books and are cited or paraphrased directly from documented sources.historyofinformation+2

Go back

—From God's Perspective

Bad Fruit

3 Corrupted Translators Produce;
3 Corrupted Alexandrian Translations;

The dirty little secret

You can tell a tree by its fruit.

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

Scriptures related to Bearing Good Fruit

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

What kind of character stands behind our modern Bible translators?

Every Bible Translator is known by the Fruit he reproduces.

Your message has been sent

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Bad Fruit

3 Corrupted Translators Produce; 3 Corrupted Alexandrian Translations;

The dirty little secret

You can tell a tree by its fruit.

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

Scriptures related to Bearing Good Fruit

Good Tree Vs. Bad Tree:

What kind of character stands behind our modern Bible translators?

Every Bible Translator is known by the Fruit he reproduces.

Your message has been sent

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

3 Corrupted Translators Produce;
3 Corrupted Alexandrian Translations;